Science has been the basis of a lot of the significant technological advancements in the world. From new drug treatments and energy production, to computer chip technology. While innovation is the primary power behind science, business is all about making money and keeping shareholders satisfied. Business and science were traditionally viewed as two separate worlds. But, they are interconnected and it is impossible to disentangle the impact of research in science from its business impacts.
While business is focused on profits, the long-term implications of its decisions can be significant for the environment, social and economic effects. Science is also concerned about the consequences of its actions, specifically its http://scorbe.de/what-is-software-piracy decisions on resource exploitation and sustainable development. A wise business, for instance, will exploit a resource to the level that science deems sustainable. But greedy businesses have led to a frenzied use of natural resources and ecological catastrophe.
We have categorised the many ways that corporations try to influence science at macro and meso levels and coded the intended effects and outcomes of these strategies (TL carried out the initial coding, AG second-coded 20 per percent of the papers). We found that corporations use five macro-level strategies that work collectively to reduce the perceived credibility of skeptical science and to increase the value of positive science. These strategies are implemented via meso-strategies that over time influence evidence in favor of the industry. This has three effects to discredit the potential harms that are caused by the use of industry products and practices; to promote policy responses that are in favour of industry; and to increase sales, consumption and use of products from industry.
Leave a Reply